Was Vikramaditya a Shatavahana king?
I have wondered for sometime about how historians managed to merge the persona of the Great King Vikramaditya with that of another historical figure six centuries after his time. Sanskrit texts list King Virkramaditya to be part of the Parmar Dynasty (of Raja Bhoja fame), an off shoot of Agni Vamsa. The other king on whom historians have conferred the aura of the legendary Vikramaditya belongs to the Gupta dynasty. My wonder deepened when the results from the recent archaeological excavations at Lumbini, Nepal, concurred with Sanskrit texts that Buddha lived 200 years earlier than what historians have agreed on. Two centuries of Indian emperors are now missing, which surely must include the original Vikramaditya! Unfortunately it is not easy to stumble upon evidence about alternate history of the Indian subcontinent by googling. I came across two interesting postings related to the Shatavahana kings whose erstwhile capital is currently under the threat of being flooded by the construction of a